The plaintiff alleged that while engaged in a covered activity under Labor Law, he tripped and fell on a chain that was cut and left in an area he had to traverse. Plaintiff alleged violations of Labor Law 200, 240(1) and 241(6). In the motion, it was established that our client was not an Owner or GC, was not the entity that cut the chain, and had no responsibility for plaintiff or the work he was performing. The Court agreed and dismissed the case against our client.
