The article details the court’s rejection of the application of the contractual liability and professional services exclusions to the opioid litigation and comments on the potential implications of the decision.

Notably, the article quotes KBR partner Paul Curley, who notes the broad scope of the professional services exclusion and comments that “[a]n appeals court could take a different approach on the professional services exclusion.” Curley’s insight sheds light on the breadth and potential application of the professional services exclusion in opioid litigation.

Read the article here.